I can't believe you really think that is a correct assessment. F&P have
been replicated. Just have a read through Jed's archives. Christ man
high school students replicated P&F with both excess heat and
transmutations, in a MIT lab and in front of over 100 ICCF 10 attendees?
Where you there? Have you seen their data? How can you make such
statements that are just not correct.
On 12/19/2011 11:49 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Cude what does this have to do with F&P having been replicated in
many labs all over the world?
They haven't been. McKubre himself has said that no one has achieved
quantitative reproducibility. And interlay reproducibility always
requires the interchange of personnel. Doesn't say much for the
robustness of the effect. What cf researchers call replication is not
what is considered replication in the rest of science. Which is why
the expert panels in 1989 and 2004 judged the evidence to be inconclusive.
