Robin,
>> Does not a 'screw-like' motion mesh with a Lissajous? or are you backing off >> of >>that? > I guess it depends on how you define "screw like". The Lissajous model at > it's >simplest depends on an oscillation and a rotation, whereas a "screw like" >motion >depends on two rotations for a closed form (creating a toroid) Yes, precisely my point, since one (of the "two rotations" you mention) can be seen as an oscillation when a vector is eliminated (it is a derivative relationship). This cross-connection is a point worthy of some research, since it relates to Rossi/DGT/Ni-H to the extent the energy gain is best explained by the underlying theory (Mills CQM as modified by yourself and others). The common denominator could relate to interference patterns. This also relates to how "nanomagnetism" can induce the orbital alteration (which itself releases UV light, which is the major source of gain in all of these experiments). Nuclear reactions are secondary and depend on prior 'shrinkage'. I did find this abstract that seems to have relevance: "When multiple light beams overlap in three-dimensional space, their interference produces tangled lines of complete darkness. These lines are called optical vortices and may be infinitely long, or form closed loops which can be linked or knotted. The vortex lines can be obtained from combining random waves... specific configurations of looped, linked or knotted vortex lines may be produced using holographic techniques to implement mathematically derived constructions... numerical experiments indicate that the tangle of vortex lines has a fractal nature.... Whether such topological features produced by interfering waves are merely curiosities or correspond to subtle physical phenomena remains an open question.
