MY, that was a general challenge. Not specific to Rossi or DGT. 2012/1/1 Mary Yugo <[email protected]>
> > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> He should publicly issue a challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him >> to witness and monitor >> their experiments. >> > > If we learned nothing else from the experiences with Rossi, it should be > that "witness and monitor" isn't enough. I suppose it may depend on what > "monitor " means -- that's a bit vague. What's needed is for disinterested > (*neutral*) investigators with the appropriate capabilities to replicate > the work *independently* of the proponent. Having a reporter look over > the shoulder of a scientist is always fun and interesting but it is rarely > definitive proof that what is going is real and is being honestly and > accurately represented. > > Especially when claims are unexpectedly robust or when independent > verification is long delayed, there needs to be suspicion at least of error > and in some rare instances, of fraud. > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
