On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote:
> some IMHO interesting article to undestand Rossi's behavior... > > 1- > analysis about why rossi don't prove e-cat so well... > http://nickelpower.org/2012/01/03/why-should-rossi-prove-it/ > > this item raise my eyes: > >> No matter what demonstration Rossi produces, public or private, it won’t >> settle the issue like an e-cat for sale at Wal-Mart will. Remember, nine >> major scientific institutions have already reproduced the Ni + H reaction, >> and the world’s response is? ”Rossi, prove it!” Why Rossi, why not SRI, >> MIT, USAF! >> > The reason Rossi should "prove it" is that he claims several orders of magnitude more power than the others and he claims it is market ready. Of course SRI, MIT and the USAF (USAF?) should prove any claims they may be making as well but the topic of the day is Rossi because his claims are so large and flamboyant and his performance to date has been so equivocal and lackluster. > but other seems good too... > > 2- > in that article > http://e-catsite.com/2012/01/03/mass-production-next-big-hurdle-for-rossi/ > you have prediction of industrialization problems for e-cat, but also > explanation of the thermo-electric devices failure often cited as a proof > Rossi is a scammer, like petroldragon is used too... > like with petroldragon, it is a credible defense, but also a good > explanation of todays seemingly strange problems... > I have no idea what this is supposed to say. The Petroldragon and thermo-electric devices were gross and obvious failures, which, at best, inspire no confidence in Rossi. At worst, they were crimes that were not properly prosecuted. hope this helps to make opinion. > What opinion is that?
