MaryYugo states with such confidence, "And while they were technically hands on, all the tests used Rossi's gear and his questionable methods so they were not independent. Failure to state that is either dismal incompetence or deliberate bias."
Note the statement, "ALL OF THE TESTS USED ROSSI'S GEAR". At least for the first public demo in Jan 2011, some of the scientists from UofB brought their own instruments to make measurements; and Mats Lewan brought some test instruments. So your statement is not factually accurate. spreading misinformation, Mary? Applying the same judgement as you, are you dismally incompetent or deliberately biased? -Mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:OpEdNews article on LENR, includes LENR powered space plane On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:48 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: Titled: What if Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) really works? http://www.opednews.com/articles/What-if-Low-Energy-Nuclear-by-Christopher-C alder-120103-869.html The article is filled with errors such as this: "Rossi's E-Cat reactors have passed every hands-on test to date by at least a dozen respected scientists from around the world." No it hasn't. Every "respected scientist" has reservations about the tests, has expressed those reservations, and has asked for independent testing. And while they were technically hands on, all the tests used Rossi's gear and his questionable methods so they were not independent. Failure to state that is either dismal incompetence or deliberate bias. The article also rehashes the patent nonsense. In fact, any obviously working and powerful reactor like Rossi claims to have would be patentable with any decent sort of application. And patent protection extends from the application date so the reasons for failing to do proper disclosure of the invention is nonsense. There are many other errors as well.
