Mary states, “I am not responding to your repetition. I didn't allege that you repeat yourself. I am responding to other people who make the same specious claims and assumptions over and over again. You don't seem to mind THEIR repetitions. Obviously, what bothers you the most is people who make cogent arguments that Rossi and Defkalion may be lying and scamming.”
My position has been for close to 10 months now, that there has always been some elements of the demos that results in INCONCLUSIVE results. Thus, all the speculations, for or against, including yours, are pretty much wasted bandwidth. This will play out however it does and nothing you write is going to change that. I prefer truth, and feel perfectly fine when that truth goes against what I might want. In fact, I was the one who brought up one of the major criticisms of the 1MW demo in my vortex posting on 10/7/2011 11:05PM: ----------------------------------- “The Tout thermocouple being within an inch or two of the hot steam flow into the heat exchanger does not sit well w/me... >From watching Lewan's video again, the external heat exchanger (XHX) was operated in counter-current flow, where the steam from the primary circuit flowed opposite to the water flow in the secondary circuit. Yeah, yeah, we don't really know how that XHX is constructed, but let's just look at the inlet/outlet physical locations on both sides of it. The steam entered the same side of the XHX as did the out-flowing heated water from the secondary side. So we are assuming that the metal fitting to which the thermocouple was attached, was at the temperature of the water flowing inside and was not influenced by the 120+C steam that was entering only an inch or two away from the thermocouple??? Just doesn't sit well w/me... ...now I can go to bed. -m ----------------------------------- Others have registered their skepticism, and I don’t chastise them because they don’t do it hundreds of times a month! The difference between you and I, is that you feel some OVERWHELMING, ALMOST PATHOLOGICAL NEED to make sure that some newbie on this list doesn’t go away with a skewed impression. I could care less… If someone is so mildly interested in this topic that they only come here once or twice, who cares what kind of impression they go away with? I don’t. Why should you?That is not the PURPOSE of this forum. I have explained this before… get the wax out of your ears. Vortex-l is not a website where people only visit once, read the comments and get some impression, never likely to return. Nearly all the contributors read this forum daily, and are therefore well aware of the HISTORY of people’s opinions. Thus, there is no need to continually state your own; or correct what YOU PERCEIVE as the wrong conclusions. Do not treat this forum as you would the comment section of some website; it is primarily for technical discussions. I asked once before, how many of your 750+ postings in only three months have any significant technical content? Any calculations? I’m not about to go back and count, but in the postings of yours that I have read, I don’t remember ANY calculations. -Mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion" - Revisited 2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> Mary Yugo stated/asked, “Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi and Defkalion. You always seem to object to my response but not to the inanity that spawned it. Why do you think that is?” That’s easy… and I’ve explained it to you before. I have stated my reservations (more than once) about the whole affair 6 months ago; and because I try to abide by the guidelines of this forum, I don’t want to repeat what I have already stated. What part of that don’t you understand? I am not responding to your repetition. I didn't allege that you repeat yourself. I am responding to other people who make the same specious claims and assumptions over and over again. You don't seem to mind THEIR repetitions. Obviously, what bothers you the most is people who make cogent arguments that Rossi and Defkalion may be lying and scamming.
