On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
More evidence that we are dealing with oscillations and need to
look at whether there are any harmonic relationships within the H-
loaded Ni lattice, plasmons, deflated H, inverse Rydbergs, magnetic
effects, etc.
This relationship should be self-evident to anyone who has read my
deflation fusion papers and posts. The hydrogen deflated state is
increased in probability by a large electron flux through hydrogen
absorbed in an atomic lattice (mesh), by high electron fugacity and
large surface potentials, conditions that occur in a resonant
plasmon state. Tunneling of deflated state hydrogen into adjacent
nuclei is increased in probability by large magnetic fields, due to a
priori spin coupling, and by the energy advantage provided by large
magnetic gradients. As noted on page 2 of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/NiProtonRiddle.pdf
this tunneling of deflated state hydrogen into heavy nuclei can
result in pure zero point energy extraction, which results in an EM
pulse consisting of a positive wave, due to protons escaping,
followed by a negative wave due to electron orbital expansion fueled
by zero point energy. It can also result in a multiple radiant
pulses of electron fueled photon generation post strong force fusion,
due to resonant motion of trapped electrons back and forth through
the nuclei with which they are trapped, and made feasible via spin
flipping when in the nucleus.
The resulting nucleus based electromagnetic energy pulses can occur
in femtoseconds, and are thus capable of synchronizing with a well
tuned stimulating frequency, producing the possibility of direct
electrical energy extraction. This effect is proportional to the
product of the probability of the deflated state forming in a given
oscillation times the probability of heavy nucleus tunneling of the
deflated hydrogen within a cycle, and this combined effect needs to
be optimized by choice of plasmon frequency, lattice (mesh) spacings,
temperature, hydrogen loading, fixed external fields, etc.
That is my comment for today. Not sure when I'll be able to post next.
Note the statement, “…a strong magnetic behavior”, and that “the
oscillations are aligned along the polarization direction of the
incident light”. These are the kinds of unusual coherences that
one never encounters in bulk matter, thus, all existing theoretical
foundations have not had to incorporate them. Since these highly
unusual coherences are not taken into consideration, theorists have
concluded that the effects from these unusual arrangements are “not
possible”. It could very well be that current theoretical models
wouldn’t even be able to accurately model these unusual conditions.
Caption from the cover:
“The cover shows the near-field amplitude image of dipolar plasmon
modes in nickel nanodisks. Each disk exhibits two bright spots
oscillating along the polarization direction of the incident light,
revealing the enhanced near-field at the rims of the nickel disks.
The image was recorded by a scattering-type scanning near-field
microscope (s-SNOM) within a study of the optical and magnetic
properties of nickel nanostructures. An interesting dual
functionality is observed: a strong magnetic behavior is identified
together with a clear plasmonic response, which could be a useful
building block for future biotechnological and optoelectronic
applications, where active control of the functional components is
required. For more information, please read the Full Paper
“Plasmonic Nickel Nanoantennas” by R. Hillenbrand and co-workers”
-Mark Iverson
<Nickel-nanoantennas.jpg>
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
