On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Meanwhile, Defkalion promises independent testing. When? Oh... "soon"! >> > > They do not promise it. They hope to have it. > > They are a privately held business. They do not owe the public anything. > They do not need to make any promises or commitments to the public, but > only to customers, stockholders and regulators. > > The same is true of Rossi. > > You seem to have difficulty understanding this concept. > What concept is that, exactly? That someone can continue to make huge claims, present no or insufficient evidence for an entire year and then expect some sort of credibility or respect? Is that your thesis? Rossi and Defkalion would owe nothing to anybody if they had kept their mouths shut, except to their investors, about their claims. Once someone makes claims which have huge public impact, you bet they owe something. They owe proof.
