Jones sez: >> I'm not surprised read that the paper states "...The global >> stellar electrostatic field is 918 times stronger than the >> corresponding stellar gravity..." More on that later.
> ... Oh… you mean that 918 turns out to be half of a particular > value that makes it seem to be rather non-coincidental? > >… we're not talking magic cubes here … or maybe we are <g> ... and a <g> back. I don't possess sufficient fizzix-speak in my brain to comprehend why it might be interesting that the value 918 is basically half the mass-ratio as measured between protons and electrons. However, I am smart enuf to at least make a note of the peculiarity. (Protons have been measured to be essentially 1,836 times more massive than electrons.) I'm still wondering about whether attractive forces as measured between charged particles is either to the cube or to the fourth power in relation to the distance. Initially, I thought it might be the same as gravity, the square of the distance. I suspect my initial assumption might be wrong. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
