His model is on his website and in many other Web places . Horace can
answer you re this similarity issue.
Peter

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't know his model. But the idea is extremely similar to Horace's...
>
>
> 2012/1/13 Peter Gluck <[email protected]>
>
>> Dera Mark,
>>
>> after so many years the memories are nor unpleasant, just interesting.
>> His model had no success but he has his supporters. His magnecules are not
>> used anywhere, as far as I know.
>> He is (was) (could be) a very nice person..Cultured.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Peter,****
>>>
>>> Sorry to dig up old, unpleasant memories, however, **IF** he has a
>>> better model for hadrons, should he not get credit?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> His side of the issue with scientific journals is explained here:****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> http://www.scientificethics.org****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> particularly with World Scientific, this page:****
>>>
>>> http://www.scientificethics.org/ir00008.htm****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> -Mark****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2012 4:59 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Santilli and Horace?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I commented in other thread- he has sued me and many others:  ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> "See "Lawsuits" here:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli ***
>>> *
>>>
>>> A very ugly story- I remember that being a member of the advisory board
>>> I have had to pay 12,000 USD fine. The lawsuit did not started but Gene was
>>> ****
>>>
>>> very upset and stressed by this affair.****
>>>
>>> An even uglier story- Richardson's  AQUAFUEL, Leon Toups, magnecules.
>>> (1998 - )****
>>>
>>> However Ruggero is a great mathematician, beyond any doubt."****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Peter****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> I just noticed this:****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santill ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> " Santilli, distinguished from better-known species by containing a
>>> novel type of bond <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_bond> called
>>> a "magnecular bond", which he claims consists of atoms held together by 
>>> magnetic
>>> fields <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field> which arise from
>>> toroidal <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroidal> polarization of their 
>>> electron
>>> orbitals 
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_orbital>.[14]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli#cite_note-ijh-13>
>>> [15] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli#cite_note-14> "****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> "Santilli has filed a number of lawsuits related to his scientific ideas
>>> [23] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli#cite_note-22>.
>>> These include suing several journals, including Infinite 
>>> Energy<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_Energy>,
>>> to force them to cite his work, "****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Did he sue Horace?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ****
>>>
>>> [email protected]****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Peter Gluck****
>>>
>>> Cluj, Romania****
>>>
>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>> Cluj, Romania
>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to