BTW: The following should not be taken to mean that I believe most actual
scientists are convinced that pursuit of replication of the Fleischmann
Pons Effect is a moot point.  I was merely trying to avert an irrelevant
argument with Jones.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:

> Moreover, this result was reported 16 years ago -- long before most
> "actual scientists" were convinced that pursuit of replication of the
> Fleischmann Pons Effect was a moot point.
>

Reply via email to