I'd add (5) In Rossi's English Yes means NO 2012/1/19 Andre Blum <[email protected]>
> Keep in mind that Rossi was probably not aware of a very thorough > discussion (including photoshop analysis, etc,) about this footage of the > BBB, concentrating around the question whether it had ever moved a single > millimeter. He just received a very simple question: > > > * 1. Italo R. January 18th, 2012 at 2:02 PM Dear Ing. Rossi, I have > watched this interview with you in Bologna realized on the 12th of January > 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odkfAjqA4pc In it appears a 1 MW > container. May I ask you if that container is the same used in the last > test with ing. Fioravanti and already sold to your customer? Thank you. > Kind regards, Italo R. > > * > This just asks: is the container in the video the same container as the > October 28 one? > * > > 2. Andrea Rossi January 18th, 2012 at 6:44 PM Dear Italo R. Yes, it > is the same: we are still working on it with National Instruments and with > the Customer. It will take another month before it will be ready. Warm > Regards, A.R. > * > This says two things: (1) yes it is the same. (2) we are working on it > with the customer and it will be ready in a month. > > Without knowledge of the fact that our heated discussion was about whether > it has ever moved, Rossi must have just tried to guess what was the reason > of Italo R.'s question. He could have interpreted it like this: "damn, mr > Rossi, all we get to see is the same old blue container. When do you show > us a red one and a green one to prove you are working on more". > > His answer can then be seen as the opposite of lying: actually a rather > open and honest answer: we're still working on the blue and improving it. > > So it could be that: > (1) the container *was* shipped > (2) the container wasn't returned. > (2) rossi didn't lie at all > (3) the footage in the 12 jan youtube video was older footage, because the > ecat.com guys had a marketing/credibility obligation to show a BBB, while > in fact during shooting on jan 12 the hall was rather empty > (4) rossi just answered Italo's question honestly, but didn't get the > point of the question, being whether it ever moved. And he didn't answer > whether that same container was still there at that same spot today, > because it wasn't part of the question. > > Andre > > > > On 01/19/2012 09:32 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: > > Andre, > > Question: > Is the container gone? > > Answer: > Yes. > > Can't be much simpler than that. > > AG > > > On 19/01/2012 11:31 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > English is not my native language, but I think (only) when interpreted > very liberally, "gone" can be interpreted as "sold". (like in: "going... > going... gone"). > > Andre Blum > > On 01/19/2012 08:56 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: > > Wolf, > > On 30 Oct 2011, Andrea Rossi said the 1 MW plant had been shipped to > the customer and he was building the next 1 MW plant in a new container. > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=27#comment-106637 > > Andrea Rossi > October 30th, 2011 at 2:15 PM > > Dear Luke Mortensen: > 1- yes > 2- yes > 3- yes. gaskets > 4- different > 5- Miami (Fl), Boston (Ma), Manchester (N.H.) > Warm Regards, > A.R. > Luke Mortensen > October 30th, 2011 at 12:54 PM > > Dear Andrea, > > 1. Is the 1MW container gone? > 2. Have you started building another 1MW in another container? > 3. Any improvements you want in version 2? > 4. Will the buyer of the next 1MW container be the same customer or a > different customer? > 5. What city will you be working (hiring) in the US? > > Best wishes, > Luke Mortensen > > AG > > > On 19/01/2012 10:38 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote: > > AG, > > Can you give us a link where he said that? I can't find any except for > some websites (not directly related to Rossi) which say so. > > Wolf > > > > > > >
