Look at AG's posts regarding solar: Following best practice in the CSP (Concentrating Solar Power) industry, where every watt is important and the heat is lower than what can be generated in a conventional thermal plant's boiler, we will be building a 1 MW E-Cat plant based on this system. We are working with Rossi to make this happen and hope to sign a contract soon. https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/FMrXOWzV58Trn23wh8_zDNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
Your comments are most welcome as we work to deliver the lowest cost Ac kWs we can. As I have said, when I can disclose information I will. Making this happen is critically important to everyone. AG Then look at Greg Watson's relationship with SunCube: You now have two Aussies that are knowledgable in concentrating solar power. Purely coincidence, right? So, move onto the business paradigms. Look at the Paradigm of Watson's Green and Gold Energy of Australia: He is adding on to another company's core product adding lenses to someone else's solar cells. This is much the same as taking Rossi's core, and adding the electric power generation. The way that they immediately make conclusive posts regarding the confidence in market production of products that are yet to be integrated is quite telling. I then looked into the technical posts made by each, and the arguments and formats are VERY similar, in their calculation of LCOE, RCE, ROI, etc. The way that they present technical arguments are very similar. I'm not in any way saying that I've found any conclusive evidence, only a fairly high confidence after less than 1/2 hour of searching. The "gotcha" from Keef was surprising, and I thought I'd have a look for myself. I think it's likely that AG and Watson are the same person. It certainly changes the way that I will read his comments, but I'm not sure that it would be any reason to ask him to leave the forum. From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Goodbye Greg Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:02:07 -0800 No Mary, go read the barrage of postings to catch up… after all, that is what you expect us to do with your barrage of repetitious postings! Frankly, your recent lack of postings has been a much welcome reprieve… -mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Goodbye Greg On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Robert Leguillon <[email protected]> wrote: After a bit of digging around the web, looking for commonality in the posts of the two personas, it certainly seems likely that AG is Greg Watson. I would concede that everything I've found is circumstantial, and that a string titled, "Goodbye Greg" was probably premature. Further, if they are indeed the same person, would that preclude acceptance on Vortex? I understand that some Vortexians may deserve an apology and restitution, but I think that his posts have been valuable, albeit some have been too quick to jump to conclusions. For those of us who came lately, can you summarize the evidence that this is the same person who apparently defrauded people by taking money for SMOT kits?
