I refer the reader to this report by your own Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf Please to to the bottom of page 3 where Horace discussed the placement of the Tout thermocouple and in particular these 3 images

http://www.redmatica.com/media/Thermo1.jpg
http://www.redmatica.com/media/Thermo2.jpg
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/LewanTcoupleClose.jpg

You need to look at the first 2 images before looking at the smoking gun evidence in the 3rd image.

The device in the images is a parallel plate counter flow heat exchanger in which the input primary heat inlet is applied at the same end as the secondary heat outlet.

This allows a dual function manifold, which is the big brass thing in the images that couples the input primary steam tubing to the heat exchanger primary inlet and in the same solid assembly couples the secondary heat exchange outlet to the outlet piping.

Doing this, I have read, increases efficiency in counter flow heat exchangers as there is heat transfer occurring from the hot steam end of the manifold through the manifold body to the cooler outlet water flow end of the manifold.

As the inlet water temperature was reported as about 23 deg C and the inlet steam was at about 110 deg C, the temperature differential across the manifold body could span that temperature range.

You could then selectively place a thermocouple bead somewhere on that manifold body and get anything from 110 deg C to 23 deg C. With just a bit of trial and error you would be able to find the perfect spot to make the Tout appear to be anything you desire. Like 10 deg C above the inlet water temperature.

Horace assumed from the 3rd image that the thermocouple was suspended in the air in front of the stainless nut or attached to the nut.

I contend, from my brief usage of thermocouples, they need some thermal goop around the bead head to ensure a good heat transfer from the measuring surface to the thermocouple head. In 3rd image do you see any goop anywhere? Any on the stainless nut? Nope. Any anywhere else? Yup. On the brass fitting to the right and below of the stainless nut. In fact it sure looks like there was a thermocouple sized head placed in the goop and then withdrawn as the insulation was opened and removed. Zoom in to get a really good look at the goop. See the withdrawal track in the goop that is about the same size as that of the thermocouple bead? There is your smoking gun as to where the bead was located. It was thermally attached to the upper surface of that brass coupling that is thermally attached to the manifold body.

Now ask yourself, if your intention was to accurately measure the temperature of the water leaving the dual manifold head, why would you attach the thermocouple to the manifold and not insert in into the stream of the exiting water?

Well just maybe as the manifold was also heated by the 110 deg C steam flowing into the heat exchanger it would be a good place for the Tout thermocouple to pick up a higher than reality temperature for the exiting water flow.

The goop and the necessary kink in the wire is there to allow the thermocouple head to attach where the goop is and are more than a smoking gun of intentional fraud. It is proof of fraud.

I also suggest the kink in the wire was there to allow the bead position to be easily altered, moved or slid across the surface of the brass fitting so as to tune the Tout temperature to be exactly what Rossi needed to best fake the 6 Oct data.

The 6 Oct Ecat data is rubbish as Horace Heffner originally claimed. Horace got it right and most of the rest of you got it wrong.

Rossi you are a serial liar and you are busted for intentional measurement fraud.

You rigged the Tout thermocouple placement onto the manifold body to generate a higher than reality temperature of the exiting water stream instead of inserting the thermocouple head into the stream of the exiting water and directly measuring the temperature of the water.

Busted, Busted, Busted. Fraud, Fraud, Fraud. Liar, Liar, Liar.

That should just about wrap this up.

Anyone still think Rossi has made a significant contribution to humanity?

Shaun

Reply via email to