the production of positron is also possible with beta+ disintegration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay#.CE.B2.2B_decay
beta+ decay is not common, but can happens
wikipedia talk of Fredeic&Irene Joliot Curie experiment of bombardment of
Al27 by He4, witch lean to n+P30, wich decay with beta+
and here they list the isotopes that decay beta+
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission

however looking for proposed widom-larsen network of transmutation
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewcarbon-seed-lenr-networkssept-3-2009
one see that no positron-decaying isotope is produced (normal they are
neutron rich)

He4 bombardment is happening in Widom-Larsen model,
so one can expect few alpha absorption by some nucleus...
the proposed reaction for Al27 (stable, found in WL Chain from C)  is
absorption of He4 except a neutron, and then positron beta decay...
and since the zone is full of heavy electrons.
maybe similar reaction


another possibility is a reaction of conversion from hypothetical
heavy-proton to neutron+positron+neutrino...
but if heavy electrons are a credible hypothesis, heavy protons is an
hypothesis to be checked by a physicist




2012/2/9 Mark Goldes <[email protected]>

> Rossi has consistently refused to provide details of what is going on
> inside the E-Cat reactor, but he has mentioned that gamma rays have been
> detected. Recently in a video interview when asked about whether the E-Cat
> was a ‘cold fusion’ technology he said, “we have found traces of fusion
> because we have found 511 kev gamma rays at the output, which is the
> emission of a positron and an electron, and a positron is the product of a
> proton turning into a neutron, so we have some kind of fusion inside, but I
> do not think this is the main energy source.” E-Cat World 2-9-12
>
> This may be old news, but in case not...
>
> Mark
>
> Mark Goldes
> Co-founder, Chava Energy
> CEO, Aesop Institute
> 301A North Main Street
> Sebastopol, CA 95472
>
> www.chavaenergy.com
> www.aesopinstitute.org
>
>

Reply via email to