no, as they say in the slide, it is alpha disintegration, that follow the rythm of beta decay. It is their explanation, and it seems standard physic (even if there is a needed trick either with "energetic state" or "pauli-excluded beta")
I could find those exambles cited beside the slides of Larsen http://prc.aps.org/abstract/PRC/v48/i1/p429_1 http://www.nucleonica.net/wiki/index.php?title=Beta_delayed_processes http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/nuctek/decaytype.html 2012/2/20 Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > Beta delayed? Don't you mean beta "speed up"? In order to get to He4, > tritium decay should be accelerated, from a half life of 10years to > something of miliseconds. > > > 2012/2/19 Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> > >> >> >> this decay is well known, so no new physics involved... >> >> it can be considered by classic Q physic... now is it true... >> >> nb: if on want to make his own opinion, one should read the dozen of key >> slides (and papers if more courage) >> start with the index: >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcindex-to-concepts-experiments-and-documents-september-14-2009 >> and follow the links >> the first to read IMHo is >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewjune-25-2009 >> >> >> W-L theory have the characteristic to use many observed phenomenon, and >> assemble them so they can explain LENR. >> >> another key point is that larsen have mane very good documents for >> evangelization. >> >> for that 2 facts, i've never found another more convincing theory. >> hints welcome. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thus, the constant attacks of Krivit on MacKubre's M4 experiment. >>>> That experiment rules out, completely, WL theory. >>> >>> >>> I understand Krivit's motivation for doing this, but I had the >>> impression that W&L have a more sophisticated explanation. I have not >>> looked closely at their work. If they say the helium data must be a mistake >>> they are clearly wrong. >>> >>> It is one thing to claim the helium data is a mistake. It is quite >>> another to claim it is fraud, as Krivit does. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > >
