http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1168
Re: Physics and Models Defkalion GT Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:34 am Site Admin Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:56 am Posts: 488 Since the last 2 decades, several theories have been proposed to explain LENR phenomena and "Huizenga's three questions: Question #1: of how the Coulomb barrier is penetrated Question #2: the lack of strong neutron emissions Question #3: the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays A short summary of most of them is presented in alphabetic order inhttp://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theorie ... ndex.shtml. This incomplete presentation includes: Bazhutov-Vereshkov Theory Chubb (Scott) Theory Chubb ( Talbot) Theory Fisher Theory Gareev Theory Hagelstein Theory Hora-Miley Theory Kim-Zubarev Theory Kirkinskii-Novikov Theory Kozima Theory Li Theory Preparata Theory Sinha-Meulenberg Theory Storms Theory Szpak Theory Takahashi Theory Widom-Larsen Theory whilst several other proposed theories are omitted from this list such as (not included all): Frank Znidarsic theory, Stoyan Sarg Sargoytchev/ M. Kanarev theory, Yeong E. Kim theory, Wladimir Guglinski/ C. Stremmenos theory, Y.T. Didenko/K. S. Suslick theory etc All of the above proposed theories are base on the assumption that only one type of reaction can occur in LENR: either those related with "strong forces" or those related with "weak forces". In most cases, results of such theories contradict with existing general theories or dogmas of present incomplete models of theoretical physics. There is a strong possibility of a forthcoming "LENR theories war" between the members of the existing small community of LENR/CF researchers (possible conflicts closely related with government funding to be released in the area). Such "war" could turn out to be a new "War of Religion", similar to the 1562- 1598 war between the catholics (the strong force fans in this case) and the protestants (the weak force fans), where all involved parties will claim their "one faith" slogan against all the others. We are following the orthodox approach, which is not to get involved in such conflicts, even though we already have a pretty good understanding on what really is going on during all faces (sic - "phases) of what we have called as a"dynamic multistage chemically assisted low energy nuclei reactions". Our decision is to do our job, which is to provide to the market safe and stable high performance products and to the scientific community with all the hard evidence from LENR phenomena measured with new type of specially designed instrumentation that we had to build to support our product's R&D. As history of science and philosophy teaches us, when there is a conflict because of "duality", in all cases the truth lies in their synthesis (Plotinus- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plotinus ) Thank you
