a fast translation,dear Alain Peter Hagelstein says he thinks that Rossi’s generator is derived from that of Piantelli. If that is true than his (Peter’s) physical models developed for Pd-D are seeming to reproduce well for what is observed for Ni-H systems.
Stremmenos strongly disagrees says Rossi has realizws a huge increase of the energy produced but also has contributed much at a qualitative level with the using of Ni powders and with the addition of the catalyst which he keeps secret in justified mode. The intuition of Rossi (but his, Stremmenos too) to use Ni powder instead of Ni rods as stubbornly insisted Piantelli (trying to optimize the effect with adequate geometric forms) was based on the simple observation that transmutations take place only on the surface- ergo for increasing these effects clearly nuclear we have to increase the surface we have use powders of Ni or of some other transition metals konown to give the cold fusion effect due to their common crystalline structure. Rossi has had also the intuition that the low energetic yields (5-15 Watts) for all the CF experiments are due to the low concentration of atomic hydrogen which easily solves and interacts with the metal. H2, D2 molecular hydrogen or deuterium were dominating and these are extremely stable and insoluble both at the temperatures of the processes- electrolytic or diffusive (start to dissociate only above 2100C)- in my opinion, introducing a chemical catalyst (?) that lowers the dissociation temperature you obtain plenty of atomic hydrogen that easily interacts with Ni. For the discussion of other ideas and results coming (with a delay of at least 15 years from the “prestigious MIT” via Prof Hagelstein I want to discuss about a) results coming not from the rich means of MIT but from the more modest of UniBo b) experimental results of spectroscopic measurements (Raman) of interest for Hagelstein as author of theories is interested to study in depth for a confrontation of his opinion with mine- that is only an opinion of an experimental physicist. N. T what he says about Piantelli is not true, the last paragraph is not clear even in Greek – but it says something like “you can be smart but I am even smarter On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > just to add that this text from stremmenos seems linked to artcile > by hagelstein , that also need to be translated(better than by MS or > google translator) > > http://22passi.blogspot.com/2012/02/peter-hagelstein-sulla-fusione-fredda.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed > > > http://22passi.blogspot.com/2012/02/peter-hagelstein-sulla-fusione-fredda_24.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed > > > 2012/2/25 Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> > >> an article about an open letter by stremmenos after >> a talk with Hagelstein. >> talk about the way the theory proposed by focardi make >> possible the developpemet of Ni+H reactors like rossi or DGT... >> >> http://22passi.blogspot.com/2012/02/stremmenos-interviene-proposito-di.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed >> >> for me it seems indirectly to support that rossi and DGT started from >> Focardi ideas, not from inventing/stealing... >> >> anyway I could not translate it correctly with microsoft translator &al >> >> http://www.microsofttranslator.com/BV.aspx?ref=BVNav&from=&to=en&a=http%3A%2F%2F22passi.blogspot.com%2F2012%2F02%2Fstremmenos-interviene-proposito-di.html%3Futm_source%3Dfeedburner%26utm_medium%3Dfeed >> >> if someone can translate correctly >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
