>From Alain:
> krivits is only relayin the unsourced data that orbit around... > hoak or not ? I find it interesting that Krivit, who claims to be an investigative reporter on matters of "Cold Fusion" and "nuclear reactions", would seem to play fast and loose with the news when it comes to certain personalities, like Rossi. This should be of concern to many because: http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/about/about.shtml > He [Krivit] and/or New Energy Times have been quoted or cited > in Nature, Science, MSNBC, Chemical & Engineering News, Chemistry > World, Intute, Current Science and many other media outlets. Meanwhile, when it comes to Rossi it would seem that any source is worth printing, particularly any source that insinuates (or misconstrues) the possibility that Rossi might be a fraud. What Krivit prints, Krivit subsequently hopes will end up getting quoted in reputable sources like Nature, Science, MSNBC, Chemical L& Engineering News, etc... Unfortunately, when Krivit's "investigations" ends up getting quoted in these other sources, I suspect few of them will have taken the time to understand what seems to be motivating Krivit to say some of the things he says. I suspect few of them are aware of the fact that Krivit has shown a relentless agenda that insinuates Rossi is most likely a fraud. Meanwhile, how many of these other news sources will take the time to notice what Krivit seems to be favorably advocating in place of Rossi. How many of these news sources will take the time to notice how incredibly one-sided Krivit's "news" can occasionally get at times. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
