LEAST significant digit. On Mar 16, 2012 2:48 AM, "Xavier Luminous" <xavier.lumin...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Off the top of my head I'd like to mention that Benford's Law is > particularly good at rooting out cheaters. Basically, the most > significant digit from a sets of naturally occurring data tends to > follow a well known power law distribution. This is true for things > like lengths of rivers, street addresses, amounts entered on your > taxes, etc. > > I know they use this in voting already, but I'm not sure exactly how. > Would be interesting to see how this works out in this particular > case. > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:03 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The reason I'm posting this to vortex-l is that of all the candidates, > the > > only one that represents a serious threat to establishment science is Ron > > Paul. > > > > The basic story is that a "signature" of "vote flipping" has turned up -- > > and the beneficiary in every case of this signature has been Mitt Romney. > > This analysis, if validated, could trigger the collapse of the Soviet, > er, > > American Empire. > > > > > http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?363915-We-NEED-more-hands-on-deck.-Significant-evidence-of-Algorithmic-vote-flipping > . > > > > The first message is a good synopsis of the current arguments. > >
