Alain Sepeda, ### sorry for the syntactically/orthographically garbled reply ### this is a hopefully cleaned one: -------------------------------
Von: Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 17:58 Freitag, 30.März 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:New global warming curves show acceleration >that explain both climastrology belief, and lenr denial. anyway both thery are right imho ------------------------------- 'climastrology'? What do you mean by that? The overarching theme, by sensible observers, seems to be a disbelief in the methods and procedures of conventional science. Which rings a tiny bit true to me. There is a lot of dirty laundry to wash. But I'm not ready to throw out the baby out of the bathwater, as currently the US evangelicals do. Just the bums. Climate science as a whole is probably the most diverse collection of factoids via the scientific method, correctly applied, and by far surpasses anything in LENR or other fields. But maybe I misunderstood You. I get quite annoyed of any AGW deniers, which cross my trail, because they so not seem the scientific method, nor the delicate web of diverse methods, which hints to a common cause. He, who does not understand that in sufficient depth, understands nearly to nothing wrt the scientific 'ahem'- realm. 'Reality', and also 'feasibility', are very sensible constructs, which result from a diversity of perspectives, and are approved by an open discourse, and not priests of whatever profession, who keep the flame. Guenter (Btw, some 3 of my posts have been lost in the list. The list notified me. It concerns Axil, Ed Storm and Abdul Rahman Lomax. Not important enough to do a post mortem. Nevertheless, I enjoy the list, because of its substantial spectrum of opinions.) >
