Dear Lou,

I hope YES is the best answer.

With some delay, Rossi has discovered something
DGT had for months- high temperature LENR+.

Peter

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 6:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Peter,
>
> Your reservations on nano-Ni may be correct.
>
> However, today Rossi claims a breakthrough:
>
> "Andrea Rossi -- May 5th, 2012 at 8:38 AM
>
> Dear Dr Joseph Fine:
> I agree.
> It’s Saturday, but today and tomorrow we will work 24 hours a day on the
> reactor we have made here in the USA: we have stabilized it at very high
> temperatures…and when I say very high I mean it. We understood the reason
> of the instability, so now the work is going on hard.
> Warmest Regards,
> A.R."
>
> So, given the above and Defkalion's claims, do you think either has a
> reasonable chance of being correct?
>
> Lou Pagnucco
>
>
> Peter Gluck wrote:
> > My dear friends,
> >
> > I have published QUI CITO No.14 on my blog; you can
> > discover  here interesting things, ideas; please do it!
> >
> > After an unusually long hesitation I have also published
> > a paper about miscoveries in LENR, it is quite heretical
> > and in some sense even blasphemious by what it states
> > and even more by what it predicts.
> > To be sincere I am not seeking popularity but I need the
> > friendship and sympathy of my LENR colleagues.
> > I was afraid that ideas as Pd-D systems have no technological
> > future and that nanometric powders have a very limited one, and
> > that Rossi and Defkalion are not LENR but LENR+, will not
> > be liked by LENR dogmatics and will be used by the anti-LENR
> > dogmatics.
> > But I had a revelation: *there do not exist LENR dogmatics at all*; for
> > all
> > my
> > colleagues solid facts are more important than old ideas. If I am right,
> > OK
> > if I say false and stupid things, this will be obvious very soon.
> > On the other part, anti-LENR dogmatists have their standard arguments
> > against LENR and are not using any other ideas.
> >
> > I well know that the impact of my writings is barely measurable on a
> > Richter
> > Scale, however please call from now on-* what Rossi and Defkalion have*
> > *LENR+.* It is LENR+!
> > Thank you and don't be angry with me.
> > Peter
> > --
> > Dr. Peter Gluck
> > Cluj, Romania
> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to