Axil, Your analysis is well put and informative. At the same time I have a very high level of confidence that if you have something pretty reliable and reproducible it will find its way to publication. It is a question maybe to play the game properly but there are many cases of unknown researchers with no affiliation that were eventually recognized by the sheer strength of their results. If we are talking about results that sometime appear, other time they don't, data that is at the limit of noise, and etc. then, unfortunately the scientific community would not listen in particular if this work is done by somebody without credentials. It is the nature of the game. It is like this in many other fields of human endeavor. If I walked in a football field while a professional team was practicing and demanded to accepted in the team unless I had incredible, demonstrable abilities and skills I would be laughed at or worse. It is just how it works. Giovanni
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > His claims are extraordinary. Almost to the scale of cold fusion, but the > effects are much more subtle. It's not cheap. > > > 2012/5/15 Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]> > >> To prove a concept or even a small scale experiment you don't need much >> funding. >> How much money the guy needs to prove the concept? >> Giovanni >> >> >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> What about funding? Show me then. >>> >>> >>> 2012/5/15 Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]> >>> >>>> There are cases of people publishing in peer review journals without >>>> the author having any affiliation. >>>> Giovanni >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Daniel Rocha >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> He won't be able to publish anywhere without the support of research >>>>> centers or funding. He is basically lost in a vicious cycle. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2012/5/14 Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Is this stuff published in peer reviewed journals? >>>>>> Sorry to say this is how science works. Nobody is going to listen to >>>>>> you unless you have done that. >>>>>> Giovanni >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Appetite Lost >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reference: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.superconductors.org/rtsc2mkt.htm >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Commercializing the First Room-Temperature Superconductor: A Bleak >>>>>>> Outlook <http://www.superconductors.org/rtsc2mkt.htm> - 5/05/12* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Intoxicated with rampant and increasing financial adventurism, the >>>>>>> US has lost its scientific and engineering vigor. In the US, it seems >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> the interest in pursuing breakthrough innovation in science and >>>>>>> engineering >>>>>>> is dead. Those who await the coming of the next black swan to pull our >>>>>>> chestnuts out of the fire will be sadly disappointed.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > >
