I see you point about oscillations of the KV, although I fail to see the reason why that is neccessarily a bad thing, as far as the reaction goes.
In light of Axil's recent speculations about a Carbon Nanotubes accumulating extreme charges that would break down the coulomb barrier, I have come up with a new working hypothesis on how to achieve this. I now believe that the creation of Carbon Nanotubes in abundance is critical. That is where the sparks come to play. I plan to expose Carbon Nanopowders to intense sparks to create Carbon nano tubes and other carbon allotropes. (This would be a variation of the KRA¨ TSCHMER-HUFFMAN generator used to create carbon nanotubes.) In addition, when the sparks ionize the H2 to H+ ions, hopefully the freed electrons would accumulate on the carbon nanotubes. You then need to promote collisions and contact between these H+ ions with the carbon allotropes that have hopefully accumulated the excess electrons. To me, if there are oscillations in the KV, that would cause the H+ ions, as well as other Carbon nano tubes and other Rydberg Matter to oscillate back and forth within the reaction chamber. This should promote more contact and collisions between these reactants. The more this "Dust" oscillates, the more likely they are to contact and initiate fusion. You want your H+ ions to be floating in the chamber, not driven to the walls (or in your case, the Ground Electrode) of the reactor. Remember, in a working reactor that is extremely hot, your Nickel nanopowder will not be sticking on the walls, but rather floating all around carried around by the turbulence. Collisions and contact are where the action is and I think your reactor design should promote this. All the better to have oscillations. I'm beginning to think that I should remove that heavy diode sink in my circuit to promote more oscillations. I humbly suggest that you might be working on the solution to the wrong problem. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Guenter Wildgruber To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 5:38 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spark plugs... thoughts and how-to? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Von: Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> An: Vortex <[email protected]> Gesendet: 21:32 Dienstag, 22.Mai 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Spark plugs... thoughts and how-to? >>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting!!! >>>>>>>>>>>> Glad jojo no problem. Misunderstandings are quite normal. Anyway. Ignition coils tend to heavily oscillate on the secondary side, which is quite undesirable in the LENR case, because it tends to neutralize the direction of the ion movements. Which is irrelevant in a combustion-motor, but not with LENR. The function of my hypothetical auxiliary mesh-grid can be more easily seen if not used. See my attached sketch. Here you can see that H+ ions tend to oscillate around their point of generation and finally neutralize with high probability. The simple trick seems to be to rectify the potential , such that the H+ ions travel towards the reactant. This can be accompished a) by -well- rectification b) by applying an auxiliary potential via the mesh (a) rectifiication- would do the job , but only for a very short time. By rectification one gains a lot. The 20-10-5..kV pulses then all work in the right direction. (b) -aux mesh potential- on the other hand, only works if the time-interval between sparks is sufficiently large (1:10..1000) compared to the dominant potential (20kV) of the major pulse, which is, say, a couple of usec. So the mesh in the strict sense is not necessary, but only for fine-control or low frequency sparks (say >100msec interval). We are not there yet. best regards Guenther Attached You find a crude graphic representation of said situation.
