Is it just me or does it seem that the numbers don't add up?
In SSM, COP should be infinite (or at least some ridiculously high number.)
And if he is running SSM 50% of the time, his overall COP should be
significantly higher than 6. The only way for him to get an overall COP of
6 is if his Driven Mode COP is negative - an equally high negative value
(that is, he is inputting a significant amount of energy during Driven
Mode.)
Anyone else caught this? Did we just catch Rossi with one of his fibs
again? Or maybe more misdirection?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "vortex-l" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 8:59 AM
Subject: [Fwd: [Vo]:Some clarifications by D.Bushnell on LENR funding @
LaRC]
Rossi update,
"The SSM (self sustained mode) is regulated by the control system based on
a complex interaction between parameters. The longest period can be 2
hours, as an average the self sustained mode runs for the 50% of the total
time. The ionizing electromagnetic emissions have no substantial delta
between SSM and driven mode."
Warm Regards (600C),
Reliable
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Vo]:Some clarifications by D.Bushnell on LENR funding @ LaRC
Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:47:39 -0700
Resent-From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 01:42:20 +0200
From: Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Hello group,
Have a read at this blogpost from nasawatch.com (it's not a NASA website
although its name might suggest otherwise to some). While its owner has a
generally quite negative stance against LENR/CF, his questions and their
answers provided by Dennis Bushnell, LaRC Chief Scientist, have proved
interesting:
http://nasawatch.com/archives/2012/06/cold-fusion-upd.html
Cheers,
S.A.
