>From the LENR/gamma experiments of Piantelli, it seems to me that the way gamma radiation is thermalized is provisional; sometimes gamma is thermalized and other times it is not.
Rossi also had occasional gamma emission problems(at startup and shutdown) before he cured this condition. If Mills mechanism is an absolute law of nature like gravity, what in the Mills theory explains why gamma radiation is not thermalized in every possible case and kindly explain what that special situation works? Cheers: Axil On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Robert Lynn > > Assuming no LENR there is no chance of CSP being competitive > with natural gas in the next few decades. > > Your bring up an interesting point, although it is not clear how you > intended it. > > In fact, there could be synergy between CSP and LENR that goes beyond > baseload considerations. This could involve efficient P-in during day time > operation, and shared heat-storage for 24/7 operation. > > Many observers are convinced that even if Mills' theory is incorrect in > major parts, the gain from LENR still originates in the EUV spectrum > (extreme ultraviolet) and via the Rydberg progression that Mills suggests. > This is the alternative to Hagelstein's "magic phonon" method of > attenuation > and it makes a lot more sense. > > In short, Mills could be wrong on many details, since he denies a nuclear > origin of excess energy, but still he could be accurate in describing the > way that nuclear energy is removed without gammas in a novel (mass to > energy) conversion process - via EUV quanta in multiples of the Rydberg > value where 1 Ry = 13.6057 eV. > > Mills' theory, in fact does accurately explain how and why the solar corona > is not only hotter than the sun itself, which is true, and how it provides > a > large fraction of energy received on earth (most of the 'light' received > begins as EUV in the corona and not as gamma radiation in the core). > > Jones > >
