Guenter, once again I believe you missed the point. I thought I did a good job
in explaining in the last post, but apparently I did not. So let me try again.
You only have the 400C recrystallization issue or the Curie Point issue or any
other temp-limiting issue if your NAE is Nickel Lattice or some other
transistion metal (with the exception of possibly Tungsten). If your NAE is
cracks, or patches, or unusual geometry on the Nickel lattice, then you have
this temp limitation and higher temps will destroy these environments.
But if your NAE is Carbon Nanostructures, you do not have an NAE that is easily
destroyed by temperatures. Carbon Nanostructures like nanotubes and graphene
can easily resist higher temperatures without its structure being destroyed.
You can host higher temps on Carbon Nanostructures NAE. Carbon Nanostructures
have demonstrated higher temperature resistance.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Guenter Wildgruber
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT 600 C Operations
Jojo,
Maybe, maybe not.
Count me in the doubter's camp.
As I tried to explain: 400++ degC is a domain where recrystallization
occurs. this is not your comfortable home-temperature.
See 'the laws of recrystallization', subtopic -- Laws of recrystallization
--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recrystallization_(metallurgy)
It is ONE thing to question ONE law, but a different thing to question
quite a bunch of them simultaneously,.
As an engineer with some philosophical leanings (quite rare) I tell You
that I am not quite ready to put Rossi into the alltime hall of fame of the
likes of Plato, Aristoteles or Einstein.
My guess is, that he is more like a Karl May character, who pretended to
have visited distant lands, without ever experiencing them, or messing things
up, doing a disservice to us all.
Sorry.
Guenter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Von: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com>
An: Vortex <Vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Gesendet: 17:31 Sonntag, 8.Juli 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]: ECAT 600 C Operations
Yes, 600c seems like an overstretch only because we do not understand
what's going on. Just like how Huzienga and Parks would think of Cold Fusion.
They don't understand it, so it is an overstretch.
However, Axil seems to have done a good job in stitching together a
probable explanation that can easily explain this 600C. This result is
entirely probable in the context of Carbon Nanostructure-based LENR. Carbon
Nanostructure-based LENR can be more consistent and controllable so I do not
see a problem with 600C, or even 1000C reaction temps.
Many seems to have recognized the possibility of Carbon Nanostructure-based
LENR paradigm, most notable of which may include both Ed Storms and W&L.
I have speculated repeatedly in the past that one of the reason why Rossi
changed to a flat design was due to the need to deliver more consistent
Sparking/arc discharge. Now, evidence is mounting that such an environment is
consistent with Carbon Nanosturcture-based LENR, as these Carbon Nanostructures
are easily created in such an electric discharge environment. In fact, I
would go one step further and speculate that I believe Rossi's new flat design
may be a hybrid Arc Discharge/CVD reactor that creates abundant Carbon
Nanostructures that appear to be critical to increased power density.
We know that Carbon Nanotubes are good NAE candidates. In Lou's post of
W&L slides, W&L presents compelling evidence of the possibility of Graphene as
a possible NAE. Both of these Nanosturcutures appear to be good platforms for
the Nuclear Active Environment. If one recognizes the possibility of these
Carbon Nanostructures as the NAE, one will not have too much problems believing
the Rossi 600C stable operating temps.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Guenter Wildgruber
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT 600 C Operations
Rossi, the sparrow does a good job of concealing his hand, in poker
speech.
And endlessly promises. Bids up his hand to 600degC, knowing that
1000degC would give him a good laugh, even from the most friendly of his
friends.
What I tried to do, is argue, that 600degC is already an overstretch of
the poker-hand from both sides: Rossi AND DGT.
Maybe I am wrong.
Actually I hope so, because the planet would be safe for another couple
of hundred years, and could heal from human folly.
Guenter
Guenter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Von: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com>
An: Vortex <Vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Gesendet: 15:25 Sonntag, 8.Juli 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]: ECAT 600 C Operations
...The assumption undergriding a pseudo-skeptics attitude is that he
understands everything there is to understand about the subject, therefore
whatever he does not understand must be false.
This of course is the sad state of attitude prevailing in modern science
nowadays.
Jojo
