His test are not enough to be death penalty evidence. However the hypothesis of a planned scam can be eliminated (too long story, not enough cash, bad communication). He have said evident lies, evident mistakes that he refuse to admit, but in a grey world it does not prevent to believe part of what he say, not because he say it, but the way he behave. The problem with Rossi is that he have few to lose, so commitment is weak.
The risk with him, with his profile, once you prevent the total planned scam, it is that he have a past to have been too optimistic, and to have lied about his problems of industrialization, getting locked in lies, just to gain time, hoping he can solve them. It is quite common among inventors, startups. sometime there is a nice end with just a late-sale, sometime a huge drama with death and prisons (remember the story of the bomb smell detector). this is the only huge risk I can identify on industrial LENR today. what make me confident are the Celani style of experiments, that clearly succeed to reach the same level of power, at high temperature, without complex technology. DGT seems quite opposite, since they now seems very careful to communicate, like normal business in risky conditions, careful not to give precise claims that could be falsified after. But it is clear, thate despite their profile, where you can expect strong commitment because they have an old reputation to protect (as individual, look at the BoD), they can get into groupthink and delusion. However delusion cannot invent the fact that you have worked or not on a real reactor, and the indirect evidence that appear in your know-how and design choices. 2012/7/9 noone noone <[email protected]> > He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many times > by too many people. > > At worst, he is a paranoid business man due to having very real enemies. > If I were in his situation I would be paranoid too. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:24 PM > *Subject:* [Vo]:Why spammers claim to be Nigerian when they are not > > I read a fascinating article and paper recently: > > "Research Reveals Why Spammers Claim They're Nigerian > > A new paper claims obvious spam email is used to weed out all but the most > gullible people online." > > > http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/06/20/nigerian_spam_email_why_spam_email_is_so_obvious_.html > > This is about a Microsoft research paper: > > http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/167719/WhyFromNigeria.pdf > > This is a brilliant analysis. I have never heard of the idea before. The > gist of it is in the headline: Internet scammers living in the U.S. often > claim to be Nigerian bankers, and they make up the most outrageous, > hackneyed and unbelievable stories. They want to eliminate all but the most > gullible potential victims. Here is the title and abstract from Microsoft: > > "Why do Nigerian Scammers Say They are from Nigeria? > > ABSTRACT > > False positives cause many promising detection technologies to be > unworkable in practice. Attackers, we show, face this problem too. In > deciding who to attack true positives are targets successfully attacked, > while false positives are those that are attacked but yield nothing. > > This allows us to view the attacker’s problem as a binary classification. > The most profitable strategy requires accurately distinguishing viable from > non-viable users, and balancing the relative costs of true and > false positives. We show that as victim density decreases the fraction of > viable users than can be profitably attacked drops dramatically. For > example, a 10× reduction in density can produce a 1000× reduction in the > number of victims found. At very low victim densities the attacker faces a > seemingly intractable Catch-22: unless he can distinguish viable from > non-viable users with great > accuracy the attacker cannot find enough victims to be profitable. However, > only by finding large numbers of victims can he learn how to accurately > distinguish the two. > > Finally, this approach suggests an answer to the question in the title. > Far-fetched tales of West African riches strike most as comical. Our > analysis suggests that is an advantage to the attacker, not a disadvantage. > Since his attack has a low density of victims the Nigerian scammer has an > over-riding need to reduce false positives. By sending an email that repels > all but the most gullible the scammer gets the most promising marks > to self-select, and tilts the true to false positive ratio in his favor." > > I expect similar predation strategies exist in nature. A gray hawk nests > close to my house. She often flies just above the trees, in a straight > line, making an ungodly noise that every prey animal for a mile around > knows that only a hawk will make. It is as if she is announcing her > presence, speed and vector. It is the opposite of the stealthy > sneak-up-and-grab technique of a cat. It is more like what a pack of wolves > will do. I assumed this was flush out animals and birds that panic. Maybe > not. Maybe it is form of the Nigerian scam strategy. The hawk drives off > the fast prey animals, leaving only slow, immature, sick or old animals > lagging behind, which are the preferred targets for any predator. > > To bring this discussion on topic -- > > When I read this, I could not at first think of why it bothered me. Then I > realized. I have often said that Rossi could not be a con-man because he > inspires no confidence. On the contrary, he makes most people I know want > to run for the exits. Now I wonder . . . could it be that he *is* a > con-man, and he is using a predation strategy similar to these fake > Nigerians. > > - Jed > > > >
