Robert Godes of Brillouin Energy does not use a laser. Do not be confused. I only used the laser description as an example of the priciple of cold pulsing.
http://www.google.com/patents?id=nWbjAQAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=Brillouin+Energy&source=bl&ots=LKEzTpOozE&sig=5xdDLBzm19a6ExkrCMeiS4bxL7o&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EbQAUOboO8L10gGI0ZC-Bw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Brillouin%20Energy&f=false If you take a look at figure 8 of the Godes patent application, you will see how he pulses the current through his micro wires [see item 0081 and onward starting on page 8]. Figure 9 shows an illustration of the pulsed current controller board. Or without diagrams: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=robert&s2=godes&OS=robert+AND+godes&RS=robert+AND+godes Here is the patent description of the pulse generator with diagrams: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7876133.pdf Note: This is different with what you(JoJo) are doing since you are using a decupled spark source. Godes is using a directly connected pulse current source. Cheers: Axil On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > Awesome explanation Axil. Very useful in directing my reactor design. > > So, Godes uses nanosecond laser. When translated to an electrical spark, > how long should a spark be? I am thinking that it would take a moderate > amount of time for the protons to be attracted to the lattice, travelling a > distance of about 1-2 mm. I am thinking that that process should take at > least a few tenths of nanoseconds. Hence, I am thinking of an electrical > arc discharge of about 70 nanoseconds or so. > > What do you think? > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Saturday, July 14, 2012 5:35 AM > *Subject:* [Vo]:Nano pulses > > Nano pulses > > Robert Godes (aka qfman), founder of Brillouin Energy has come up with an > important engineering idea in the field of LENR: high energy nano-pulses. > > Some background first, brief (picosecond or high femtoseconds) laser > pulses cause Coulomb explosion. Depending on the type material being > irradiated, enormous laser beam intensities are required (10–400 terawatt > per square centimeter). > > This extreme power can only be delivered for a very brief instant of time. > This powerful but narrow laser beam produces plasma of ionized atomic > particles when a small amount of solid material explodes when hit with this > high energy EMF pulse. > > A Coulomb explosion is a "cold" alternative to the dominant laser etching > technique of thermal ablation, which depends on local heating, melting, and > vaporization of molecules and atoms using less-intense longer duration > laser beams. Extreme pulse brevity down only to the nanosecond regime is > sufficient to localize thermal ablation – before material heating is > produced and is conducted very far; the energy input (pulse) has long ended. > > Robert Godes does the same thing: extremely powerful cold energy delivery, > in his reaction to keep his micro wires from burning up. His direct current > pulse is only nanoseconds long but when they are in progress, they supply > huge amounts of EMF to the lattice. > > For those using SWNTs in their reactions, they should draw a valuable > lesson from Godes. They should pulse ultra-short high powered DC current > down the SWNT via their substrate to produce maximum electrostatic fields > but at the same time keep the SWNT cool and undamaged. > > How the reaction works. > > It has been observed that electron screening can reduce the coulomb > barrier in the dust floating in space by many orders of magnitude: See the > thread, Trojan Horse. > > There are large amounts of protons derived from high pressure hydrogen > packed into the lattice of the reactor. The SWNT will induce an extreme > electrostatically negative field in the lattice for a few nanoseconds. This > negative EMF will draw these hydrogen ions (protons) near the now naked and > ionized nuclei of the lattice. > > We now know that tunneling is proportional to the number of like positive > charged particles that are close to the positively charged coulomb barrier. > > This large clustering of protons will aid one another through constructive > Broglie matter wave interference to get one or two of their number to > tunnel their way through the coulomb barrier of the lattice material whose > nuclei has been greatly lowered by the negative field coming from the tip > of the SWNT during the nano-pulse. > > > Cheers: Axil > >
