Jones, I do not consider the far field balancing out of an electromagnetic radiation waveform as a new form of negative radiation. Radiation patterns have been modified by the addition of extra elements for many years in the radio business to protect other stations. This is well understood and widely practiced.
A perfect example of the far field balancing of waves can be demonstrated by the action of a charged particle moving in a circular path. The single charge radiates an RF far field wave that is maximum at right angles to the plane that the motion is restricted to. If you then add many more equal charges to the path that are equally spaced and ultimately continuous, then there will be a vanishing far field. This is due to the fact that the vector sum of all of the individual radiating charges balance out. If the frigorific radiation is merely another way to express the balancing of far fields by vector addition then I can see no good reason to complicate the issue. Do you consider that there is another form of negative radiation acting in this manner? If so, what natural laws would define that behavior? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Jul 16, 2012 9:57 am Subject: [Vo]:Frigorifics 101 Googling "frigorific rays" provides a quaint history lesson in itself, eighted to some extent in the self-delusion of an earlier time frame; but .. is there anything to it, in the way of scientific validity ? Well, yes there is, and a good analogy might start in chemistry - ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frigorific_mixture "A frigorific mixture is a mixture of two or more chemicals that reaches an quilibrium temperature that is independent of the temperature of its omponent chemicals before they are mixed." IOW ... 2+2 does not always qual four in terms of thermal mixtures. Moving on to waves and photons, we ould need to find a similar kind of energy polarization, where the nteraction of two entities proceeds to provide what is essentially 2+2=1... nd guess what, it happens all the time (in the audible range). In fact, frigorific radiation would be a cancelling wave - which itself is ust as energetic as is the wave to be nullified, but in the end both are educed significantly. There is also a google entry for this phenomenon in nother kind of sensory wave: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_noise_control You can see why this would work with sound, where there are longer avelengths and fewer distinct frequencies to manage. Heat is another story, ith short wavelengths and a wide spectrum. In the end, a "frigorific ray" or blackbody radiation would not be a single frequency, but would need to rovide specific frequencies of anti-noise for all of the spectrum, and at a ery short wavelength. Plus the cancelling radiation would need to change in tep with the lowering of temperature. This would involve the so-called T-wave, which is normally felt as heat - ut it would presumably be the anti-noise of the blackbody frequencies ssociated with a particular temperature, and would require a digital signal hat canceled thermal radiation at every stage of the reduction. Not impossible, perhaps, but very daunting... perhaps frigorific radiation ill be routine when computers get to be about 1000 times more powerful mid-terahertz, which is 15 years from now, if you apply the House version f Moore's law - a doubling every 18 months). Jones
