> http://www.e-cataustralia.com/ > > http://www.freeenergysystems.com/Andrea_Rossi_Discusses_The_E-Cat_Part_1/ > > http://pesn.com/2012/07/19/9602138_LENR-to-Market_Weekly_July19/
Thanks Hoyt, From http://www.freeenergysystems.com/Andrea_Rossi_Discusses_The_E-Cat_Part_1/ Ar claims: > The industrial version of the E-Cat is already for > sale, while the domestic (or home) version is set > for 2013. However, although the certification of > the residential version is still on course we cannot > foresee the scheduling because it does not depend on > us. This strikes me as a dubious claim, specifically the fact that Rossi claims the industrial eCat version is already for sale. However, I would like feedback from the Collective on the matter. If the ecats are already for sale in the industrial market I would have thought that we would have heard at least a few tiny morsels of news on the matter from companies that had purchased the product. I can't believe that every single company or industry that allegedly purchased Rossi's industrial eCat would have all felt it would be in their best interest to remain mum about what they had purchased. I've heard zilch. Nada! I think it's "zilch" because Rossi really hasn't sold any - except presumably to a mysterious individual last October/November. I hope my conclusions are incorrect. ...and > FES: Now, with regards to the certification process, you > say that it's an independent organization that is > certifying it. Does the E-Cat also have to get some > type of certification from the U.S. government? > > AR: No, as far as we know, there are no government > certifications that are requested for this apparatus. We > already had a contact with government persons, but, due > to the characteristics of our apparatuses, which does not > use radioactive material, does not produce radioactive > waste, and does not emit radiations outside of the > apparatuses doing the operation there are no reasons to > request any government observation. This is what has > emerged so far. So, the certification made by a third > party, specialized certification company is enough by > law as of today. Of course, we do not know the future > because I cannot predict this at all. I can only answer > based on what is the situation today. I also find this to be a dubious claim. I would think a considerable amount of testing will be needed before Rossi's eCats would be allowed to be sold to the public within the United States. By 2013? No way! According to Rossi's own words, the apparatus still emits what I presume is harmful radiation, even though Rossi also claims it emits none "...outside fo the apparatuses". The fact that the device emits radiation (shielded or not) makes it potentially a very dangerous product. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
