Here are some pictures of what a SWNT carpet looks like:


http://mmptdpublic.jsc.nasa.gov/jscnano/CD/Session%201/Robert%20Hauge.pdf



Page 8 is a very good picture.


Cheers:   Axil


On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

>  The SWNT rug part 1
>
> Fabrication of the ideal charge delivery nanostructure for LENR may be
> beyond the capabilities and limited resources of the lone Ni/H reactor
> developer. This may be why Rossi has greatly benefited from collaboration
> with advanced technology partners who can design and implement advanced
> SWNT structures that are optimized for LENR.
>
>
>
>
>
> To get the most out of LENR, charge must be evenly spread over the entire
> surface area of the nickel nanoparticles, as large as that area may be.
>
>
>
>
>
> Most publically available LENR mechanisms currently found in LENR research
> suffer from a poor distribution of nuclear active sites. The energy
> production of these areas is limited in number. Furthermore, the
> distribution of the nuclear active sites (NAS) is random and poorly placed.
> This all leads to a proportionately small productivity of the Ni/H
> reaction. But if properly configured,* *nanomaterial is a powerful
> multiplier of the LENR effect in inverse proportion to its dimensionality.
>
>
>
>
>
> For example, if you want to properly water a corn field to get optimum
> crop yield, we do not want to pump all the irrigation water into a big hole
> in a corner at the edge of the field and hope for the best.
>
>
>
>
>
> A water distribution system; a sprinkler or drip system must be engineered
> to get water to each corn plant at optimum levels.
>
>
>
>
>
> Like water dumped into a hole, A spark can only be delivered to a small
> volume of material in a localize area. The reaction, if any, will be
> limited by the restrictions of this localized charge distribution strategy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To increase the power of the LENR reaction, the number of NASs must be
> dramatically increased.
>
>
>
>
>
> The spark should be optimally partitioned and spread out over the widest
> area, in the same way that nano-particles multiply the surface area of its
> bulk material. So charge distribution and nanoparticle area should be
> properly mated through an optimal connection.
>
>
>
>
>
> If this relationship between charge presentation and the associated
> nanoparticle is optimize, a large amount of power can be produced by a
> small amount of Nano-powder. As improbable as Rossi’s claim may now sound
> …those one and a half grams of Nano nickel powder can generate 10 kilowatts
> of power…  This amazing claim may be possible if every nano particle
> grain is pressed into service in an optimal way.
>
>
>
>
>
> In my next post, I intend to reference a paper recently commissioned by
> the US Defense Department (DOD) to explain why a SWNT rug can get charge to
> nickel Nano powder is the best way. This explanation will act as a
> narrative for a specification of a charge distribution system for LENR.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers:  Axil
>
>
>
>
>
> * *
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to