I am interested in this part as follows:
*Technology Status:* * * Multiple coherent theories that explain LENR exist which use the standard Quantum Electrodynamics & Quantum Chromodynamics model. The Widom-Larson theory appears to have the best current understanding, but it is far from being fully validated and applied to current prototype testing. Limited testing is ongoing by NASA *and private contractors* of nickel hydrogen LENR systems. Two commercial companies (Leonardo Corp. & Defkalion) are reported to be offering commercial LENR systems. Those systems are advertised to run for 6 months with a single fueling cycle. Although data exists on all of these systems, the current data in each case is lacking in either definition or 3rd party verification. Thus, the current TRL assessment is low. There is often a disconnect between the covert side of the government and the civilian R&D side. Just like the Hubble space telescope was very much like the Key Hole recognizance satellites and even through a young CIA employee named William Kampiles was accused of selling a KH-11 System Technical Manual describing design and operation to the Soviets, NASA had to go it alone and the covert side stood by and let NASA go down the tubes. This divide will persist for LENR as well. See for bachground: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_Kennan Cheers: Axil On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Ron Kita <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings Vortex, > > An interesting Boeing citation NASA CR 2012- 217556 on LENR > http://coldfusionnow.org/next-generation-nasa/ > About 33% down the website above > > Respectfully, > Ron Kita, Chiralex > >
