ok, Canadian immigration does not care, who immigrates. 1) On this level it is just about the rules. Pay yor dough, be compliant. No problem here.
2) On a higher level, say Canadian secret service, it is about risk assessment. They may very well be asleep at the wheel. 3) The next level would be DGT starting operations within CDN, which wakes up the institutions. 4) On the next higher level it gets political. Even a moderate chess-player like myself could anticipate these moves. If not, you are hopefully lost. So what happens next? 5) Here we enter the domain of the probable, where I speculate, that the Harper-government would step in and limit DGTG-CDN-operations, as soon as it gets effective. Considering this, DGT would be well advised to stay in Greece, where law and lobby-interests are weak, and not operate near the belly of the energy-beast, which will fight teeth and claw to prevent energy-revolution. Probabilistic in the sense as: that a chess player enters the domain of moves, where nothing is certain, but (im-)probable. Finally: Considering this, DGTs move seems to be a bad move to me. But I might be wrong. Such is probabilistic thinking. The beauty: I will never be disappointed. I just shift probabilities: Guenter ________________________________ Von: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Gesendet: 22:48 Freitag, 27.Juli 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:ICCF-17: Brillouin is no more? Guenter Wildgruber <[email protected]> wrote: I am very aware of possible positive effects of this move. > > >My main argument is probabilistic. I am not sure what "probabilistic" means in this context. But in any case, your statement about how the Canadian government might refuse to allow an incorporation is nonsense. The law does not permit that. - Jed
