By all means, Abd, I'm asking -- on list. Please show the list what you mean. Is this the kind of treatment one can expect from Vortex-L? I don't see anyone else getting such disrespect, not even Mary Yugo when she was directly operating against the list's rules. So, yes, please explain what you mean, in detail. Kevin O
--- On Wed, 8/1/12, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> wrote: From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Free Republic thread about cold fusion seems more positive To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2012, 9:08 PM Mmmm.... looking at your posts, Kevin, I predict a site ban is coming. Not because of "cold fusion," but because of your own lack of restraint. You really describe the problem in your comment here. Kevin, if you want to effectively represent cold fusion to the world, please grow up. If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you are welcome to ask, on or off-list. By the way, you are indeed dealing with pseudoskeptics. So? What else would you expect? At 03:52 PM 8/1/2012, [email protected] wrote: > Hello Jed: > Yes, that was me. I posted a lot of Cold Fusion articles over the last 3 > years, starting from before Rossi arriving on the scene. > > <http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles > > I put up with a lot of abuse from the skeptopath crowd, especially due to > Rossi pulling his showmanship shenanigans. > > I was operating with my hands behind my back, because I would call the >skeptopaths "seagulls". It was an effective countermeasure to their constant >derision. It was also an accurate representation of the scientific value of >their 'contributions'. The admin moderator told me to stop calling them >that. I gather I hurt their feelings. But the admin moderator continued to >allow all kinds of stalking, disrupting, personal attacks and distortions from >the anti-LENR crowd. Lately it's gotten worse. The moderator has started >pulling threads entirely. > > Kevmo > > p.s. I missed a chance to meet KP Sinha when he was in town. He looked me up > and called me. Unfortunately, that was the day that my car decided to go > kablooey. > > > > Jed Rothwell > Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:20:07 -0700 > > Hold it. This was the 2009 thread: > > > <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts > > Here is the recent one: > > <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/posts>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732072/posts > > > This is the Sinha ICCF-14 paper. > > What I mean by "positive" is, for example, where someone said "this article > is bunk" someone else responded: > > "This guy is a world class scientist with several articles published in peer > reviewed journals, and it pulls only from classical physics. Explain how it > is bunk." > - Jed
