On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ron Kita <[email protected]> wrote:

> At the Tesla conference...one commenter said that when Richard Feyman saw
> the machine ..run.

http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue51/papp.html

excerpt:

"Feynman's Mistakes and the Recovery
But at the public meeting the next month at which the fatality
occurred (see the local newspaper account of the fatality and
injuries-p. 30) was Caltech physicist Richard P. Feynman (1918-1988),
who had worked on the Manhattan atomic bomb project in World War II.
Before even arriving at the demonstration, Feynman assumed that the
Papp engine, whose operation he was about to witness, had to be part
of an elaborate hoax. We know this because he recounted his reactions
during the episode in his widely circulated internet account touted by
the "skeptic" community (see "Mr. Papf's (sic) Perpetual Motion
Machine," p. 29).

But here is the central problem with Feynman's analysis (which has
many other errors of fact and logic embedded in it): There was a court
action against Feynman by Papp and his backer, Don Roser of
Environetics, Inc., as a result of Feynman's inept attempt to disprove
the Papp engine with his unauthorized pulling of an electric
control-circuit wire that Feynman egregiously imagined had to be
powering the engine. It was unfortunate for Feynman that the wire's
gauge was far too thin even had there been a secret electric motor
within the retrofit Volvo engine. Furthermore, as you will read, the
engine kept running even after the flimsy wire was removed. Feynman
asserted that Papp most likely had deliberately planned to blow up his
own engine to avoid subsequent discovery of the "fraud"! And, Feynman
acknowledges that there was an out-of-court settlement with Caltech.
Surely, had there ever been the slightest piece of evidence that
conventional explosives blew up the Papp engine that day, Caltech
would most certainly not have had to settle. Papp would soon have been
charged with manslaughter, no doubt, and Feynman would surely have
cited this evidence publicly. He was not one to shrink from dramatic
gestures. Caltech also had the motive and the means to skewer Papp
with the kind of evidence that is routinely gathered by police
departments and crime labs following explosion accidents."

<more>

Reply via email to