Jed,

Thanks, I have read Ed's guide and found it very easy to understand and
very informative.  He mentions there is only one pathway (other than
fission) to release that level of energy - Fusion, while I believe there is
another which better explains the phenomenon seen across the board - the
evaporation of quantum singularities, nature's perfect heat engine.  The
confusion goes away when you embrace the thought.

In the last years of Einstein's life he studied this.  I know you hate
wilkipedia but here you go:

In physics <http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics>, there is a *speculative
* notion that if there were a black
hole<http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole> with
the same mass and charge as an
electron<http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron>,
it would share many of the properties of the electron including the magnetic
moment <http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_magnetic_dipole_moment>
and Compton
wavelength <http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_wavelength>. This idea
is substantiated within a series of papers published by Albert Einstein
between 1927 and 1949. In them, he showed that if elementary particles were
treated as singularities in spacetime, it was unnecessary to postulate
geodesic <http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic_(general_relativity)> motion
as part of general
relativity.[1]<http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_electron#cite_note-0>

On Monday, August 6, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>
>> CE, you haven't paid adequate attention. I'll say this much for you, the
>> literature can be confusing.
>
>
> I agree it is confusing, and this is a problem. That is why on the main
> page and Introduction page I recommend papers such as Storms and McKubre:
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEastudentsg.pdf
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHcoldfusionb.pdf
>
> When people from the mass media contact me, I send them to those two, plus
> Barnhart for background:
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BarnhartBtechnology.pdf
>
> (I do not start off by calling them useless, lazy, ignorant gits.)
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to