Dave: I dont think its going to be some oblique angle either itll likely be some multiple of 90degs; or half a pi if you prefer your physics served up that way! ;-)
bon appétit! -m From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012 DaveR, I got sidetracked with my posting on genies and all, kind of feeling a bit hi today!, and forgot that I wanted to respond to your comment about mag-flds absolutely they will be important because they affect the geometries/alignments. Possibly also alternating E and B flds By definition, the atoms in a metal lattice are already aligned, but being able to tweak that alignment to some degree could very well be a key requirement -mark From: David Roberson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012 DGT mentioned that the reacting hydrogen electron was in the vicinity of the proton and nickel atom for a short time period during which the fusion occurred. Does this match quantum physics theory? I thought that there is no way to locate an electron at a particular time and that it is everywhere within its orbital all of the time. Perhaps they are adding support to classical physics in their description. The other possibility is that they really do not understand the mechanism. I bet on the later. It is interesting to see that DGT suggests that a magnetic field is important for the device operation just as I have suspected. Dave
