Thanks Andre - that "little discrepancy" between the real data and conclusion - is what makes it hard to believe that the claimed COP of 8-22 gain is real.
There is almost no supporting data for that conclusion. After all - this chart is apparently the only real data they chose to show, and the gain is so low that it could be measurement error. Would not one be inclined to show better, if one had better? I like the fact that there is some gain, but the real data, going back to Thermacore, and including Celani's demo - is that the proved gain in Ni-H is generally COP<2. Apparently from the conference in Korea, according to Jed, Brillouin may be poised to show more than that - if SRI can duplicate. The good news, but only in a "perfect world" is that proved COP>1 should win the Nobel prize, but the bad news is that until gain gets above 3 for extended periods, this technology is going to be hard to commercialize -----Original Message----- From: Andre Blum If you download the .docx document you can zoom the picture...it says: [snip] Heat - out Wh: 166.34 Electric- in Wh Total: 145.675 So that show excess heat, but not by a factor of 8 - 22.
