works for me On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Andre Blum <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would explain why at NI-week he saw more output than at ICCF: 5000 > people make more vibrations than 300. > > > On 08/15/2012 01:33 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > > Jed, > > What if you make some loud noise around it or shake it?(he probably does > not want you to shake it) Does the energy output increase?...I am serious. > The singularities he created in those voids should be sensitive to any > type of external EMR or stimulation > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Akira Shirakawa < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2012-08-15 18:24, Daniel Rocha wrote: >> >>> In the paper, he said he is limited by the use of the kind glass of >>> glass, used for observation, which is fragile beginning at 275C. The >>> next step, is to use quartz, which can support higher temperatures. >>> >> >> If peak temperatures are an issue, it could be an idea to decrease input >> power when using more than an active wire in this reactor type. For trade >> shows and the like, this would still lead to a useful (although "dumb") >> increase of the COP. >> >> But I guess Francesco Celani will probably want to increase / improve >> other control parameters first. Using higher temperatures to try reaching a >> self-sustaining operation threshold (as he hopes in his latest >> presentation) might be something that quartz glass could enable. >> >> Cheers, >> S.A. >> >> > >
