I wish I were as sure of my theory as you guys sound. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.3208v2.pdf
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Like most predictions of string theory; super-symmetric particles, micro > black holes, no one (AKA CERN) has detected them yet at any energy. CERN is > way beyond any energy the cold fusion can reach or hot fusion for that > matter. The prospects are grim. The string people are disappointed. > Stringologists produce theory by the ton and none has been experimentally > verified. Don’t stake your theories on strings. Strings are fringe science. > > Cheers: Axil > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Stewart Simonson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Always slept well at night >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Chemical Engineer <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > OK, you are right, it did wake me up at night. >>> >>> Did you start having these dreams before or after you first read about >>> quantum singularities? >>> >>> harry >>> >>> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Chemical Engineer < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > No, I am not making it up and it was not a dream >>> >> >>> >> Physics is ultimately a work of the imagination. Over time some of >>> >> those imaginings are retained and studied while others are >>> >> dismissed or forgotten for lack of evidence and other times for >>> >> reasons of fashion or politics and religion. >>> >> >>> >> Physics is not out there, it lives in you. >>> >> >>> >> Harry >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > A charged black hole is a black hole that possesses electric charge. >>> >> > Since >>> >> > the electromagnetic repulsion in compressing an electrically charged >>> >> > mass is >>> >> > dramatically greater than the gravitational attraction (by about 40 >>> >> > orders >>> >> > of magnitude), it is not expected that black holes with a >>> significant >>> >> > electric charge will be formed in nature. >>> >> > >>> >> > A charged black hole is one of three possible types of black holes >>> that >>> >> > could exist in the theory of gravitation called general relativity. >>> >> > Black >>> >> > holes can be characterized by three (and only three) quantities, its >>> >> > >>> >> > mass M (called a Schwarzschild black hole if it has no angular >>> momentum >>> >> > and >>> >> > no electric charge), >>> >> > angular momentum J (called a Kerr black hole if it has no charge), >>> and >>> >> > electric charge Q (charged black hole or Reissner-Nordström black >>> hole >>> >> > if >>> >> > the angular momentum is zero or a Kerr-Newman black hole if it has >>> both >>> >> > angular momentum and electric charge). >>> >> > >>> >> > A special, mathematically-oriented article describes the >>> >> > Reissner-Nordström >>> >> > metric for a charged, non-rotating black hole. >>> >> > >>> >> > The solutions of Einstein's field equation for the gravitational >>> field >>> >> > of an >>> >> > electrically charged point mass (with zero angular momentum) in >>> empty >>> >> > space >>> >> > was obtained in 1918 by Hans Reissner andGunnar Nordström, not long >>> >> > after >>> >> > Karl Schwarzschild found the Schwarzschild metric as a solution for >>> a >>> >> > point >>> >> > mass without electric charge and angular momentum. >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Chemical Engineer < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Conductivity inversion effects in a metal wire/lattice. It is >>> well >>> >> >> > understood that a singularity carries charge, angular momentum >>> and >>> >> >> > radius >>> >> >> > like any other particle. It is also understood that when they >>> >> >> > evaporate >>> >> >> > they >>> >> >> > emit charged particles. This can have a direct effect on the >>> >> >> > conductivity of >>> >> >> > a metal. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ah... so you are hypothesizing a particle with a set of special >>> >> >> properties. >>> >> >> Sometimes you refer to this particle by the name 'singularity' and >>> >> >> other times you refer to it by the name 'gremlin'. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Harry >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> harry >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >
