Jones, I agree. I believe this reaction starts with a collapse of matter compressed within a crack or void. As in the macro scale universe, the degree of collapse may vary all the way down to a micro black hole, which is the extreme case. Any collapse should be instantly followed by a burst of energy, as observed.
It makes sense that Rydberg or inverted Rydberg matter should be more reactive since you can cram more mass into a given size void due to its ultra-high densities. Add electrical charge, compression and the repulsion from the walls of the crack/void and you get the correct environment for a further collapse of matter. If the collapsed matter hangs around it should have extreme localized blue-shifted radiation near it's surface to trigger fission and fusion events with other atoms near its surface. It may or may not evaporate completely and in my opinion would be a bad actor if it hangs around. It would also create magnified quantum mechanical/uncertainty events in its surroundings if it does hang around and behave like a super atom. On Wednesday, August 22, 2012, Jones Beene wrote: > The Rice/Kim paper below gives a pretty good introduction to the DDL or > Deep > Dirac Layer (put forth by Maly and Va'vra in Fusion Technology). Rice/Kim > et > al make a valiant effort to disprove, or at least cast doubt on the reality > of the DDL, but the underlying assumptions in eq. 9,10,11 have problems of > their own. > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf > > Curiously Rice/Kim et al do not mention Miley & Holmlid's conception of > IRH, > or Inverted Rydberg Hydrogen. But they do mention Mills conception of > deeply > redundant ground states, but not accurately. > > At any rate - the main point of all this is the similarity of Mills, Miley > & > Holmlid and Maly & Va'vra - at least when all of their suggestions are > taken > together and mashed, so to speak; making a putative case for the identity > of > so-called dark matter. Perhaps one must cherry-pick amongst them to get the > best details, but there seems to be something very intuitive in this > correlation of dense-hydrogen to dark matter. > > All of them, and Mills is first in the chronology IIRC, suggest that this > dense state of hydrogen can be the "ash" of reactions such as those which > occur in the corona of our sun and most other starts, and which the end > product consists of tightly bound hydrogen atoms with an extremely tight > orbital. This has appeal in being the best way to account for the missing > mass (dark matter) of the universe, since that mass is really nothing new > at > all, but is in effect another form of hydrogen. The electron orbit radius > of > the DDL is only ~ 5 fm. > > I mention this today since the group has been graced by the presence of the > honorable Mark Gibbs, who may be looking for every science journalist's > dream story - to not just report the little incremental advances in science > - but to pick a winner of major importance and deep significance. A game > changer. > > Jones >
