At about 10 minutes into the interview, the question that is most relevant crops up, which is how can one overcome the block on scientific publication. This is most relevant because it gets to the heart science itself, and the institutional incompetence currently besetting science. Yes, I think this is more relevant than is the provision of an energy revolution because although power is of primary physical importance, the cultural importance of science gets to the central value of being fully and completely human: A mind free to pursue the truth of being.
The answers provided by McKubre were an indictment of civilization itself because they did not address how it is that civilization could concoct such an incompetent system of scientific publication hence could not address how to remediate that incompetence. To merely say "Well, all's well that ends well." or "There are no utopias." is to skirt responsibility for this artifact we call civilization. There is clearly a very serious disease of unknown etiology, of which the failure of scientific publication is merely a symptom. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:10 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > This link to the audio works: > > http://www.mevio.com/episode/318736/fen.120828 > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://m.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3Interview> >> >> Listen >> >> On August 28, Sterling Allan conducted an interview with Michael McKubre >> as part of the Free Energy Now series. >> >> It was found in this blog >> >> >> http://pesn.com/2012/08/29/9602171_Michael-McKubre_on_Cold-Fusions_Rise_Despite_Political_Academic_Suppression/ >> >> >> > >
