Axil, Well, in the macroworld, when you pack too many molecules and atoms into an ultradense space you get gravitational collapse. In the quantum/atomic scale world it depends upon which theory you buy into and you already said you do not believe in M theory(I think?). They recently think they discovered the Higgs, a boson. This theory also postulates a graviton, also a boson which comes into play at quantum scales and answers the question along with predicting extra dimensions of space all curled up.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/07/10/3542763.htm In the example of the observed bosenova, the mass of the collapse appears much less than the minimum size for a singularity to form (22 micograms minimum predicted) and thus the collapse triggers an immediate and complete evaporation and release of radiation and heat from the colapsed condensate If enough mass were available for a micro black hole to form that also did not evaporate instantly, it would perfectly obey the Heisenburg uncertainty principle, in fact it would be a magnified example of it. Just the observance of a micro black hole using photons would instantly change its energy state, since it absorbs energy and this would change its momentum. I cannot think of anything more uncertain in our universe than what is inside one of those massive black holes out there in space. In a complete vacuum, where you have no matter available, it is thought that particles and antiparticles pop up out of the vacuum and typically "annihilate" each other instantly, unless there is a black hole nearby to swallow the antiparticle to aid in its evaporation and send the other particle flying off into space to possibly create matter as we know it. Black holes may be both nature's way of creating matter over time that pops out of the vacuum as well as evaporating it within the universe over time. If you are a programmer it reminds me of either a do loop or while loop. Hawking's last book discusses it. The BEST thing that could happen to cold fusion is that it takes us from some fringe science most people laugh at to actually providing data for & answering some basic questions about the Universe. It's just gravity. That is my take on it. Stewart http://wp.me/p26aeb-4 On Friday, August 31, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > > So sorry, please excuse me; ChemE Stewart, the uncertaty principle is the > reason why your singularity theory is unworkable. At the atomic level, > Gravity is too weak a force by many orders of magnitude to overcome the > energies produced by a large accumulation of matter in too compacted a > volume to produce a nano-singularity. You cannot overcome the exponential > energy increase of compressed matter in the vacuum. Cheers: Axil > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> The energy of the vacuum causes the Bosenova >> >> >> From: http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0412041 >> >> >> *The collapsing condensate was observed to lose atoms until the atom >> number reduced to about the critical value below which a stable condensate >> can exist. The dependence of the number of remaining atoms on time since >> initiation of the collapse _evolve was measured for the case of an initial >> state with Ninit = 16000 atoms and repulsive interaction corresponding to >> ainit = +7a0, where a0 is the hydrogen Bohr radius. * >> >> >> *The onset of number loss is quite sudden, with milliseconds of very >> little loss followed by a rapid decay of condensate population (within 0.5 >> ms) after which the condensate stabilizes again. This behavior results from >> the scaling of the loss rate with the cube of the density, the peak value >> of which rises as 1/(tcollapse − t) near the collapse point. * >> >> >> *This allows a precise definition of the collapse time tcollapse, the >> time after initiation of the collapse up to which only negligible numbers >> of atoms are lost from the condensate. Another quantitative result of the >> experiment is the dependence of tcollapse on the magnitude of the >> attractive interaction that causes the collapse, parametrised by the >> (negative) scattering length acollapse. These measurements are performed >> from an initial state with Ninit = 6000 atoms in an ideal gas state (with >> interaction between them tuned to zero). The tcollapse datapoints presented >> in the original paper have undergone one revision of their acollapse values >> by a factor of 1.166(8) due to a more precisely determined background >> scattering length. * >> >> >> * Although the main focus of this paper shall be on the collapse time, >> we mention two other striking features of the experiment: the appearance of >> ’bursts’ and ’jets’. One fraction of the atoms that are lost during the >> collapse is expelled from the condensate at quite high energies (∼100 nK to >> ∼400 nK, while the condensate temperature is 3 nK); this phenomenon was >> referred to as ’bursts’. Finally, when the collapse was interrupted during >> the period of number loss by a sudden jump in the scattering length, >> another atom ejection mechanism was observed: ’jets’ of atoms emerge, >> almost purely in the radial direction and with temperatures a lot lower >> than that of the bursts (a few nK)* >> >> >> My theory of the bosenova explosion >> >> When too many atoms are packed into too confined a space, the uncertainty >> principle comes into play. A confined space means an uncertain(aka high) >> kinetic energy. When confinement gets high enough, the associated increase >> in kinetic energy destabilizes the condensate and the condensate breaks >> down. When the condensate breaks down, the energy derived from the vacuum >> is carried off by high energy atoms in the form of jets and bursts as >> described above. >> When the condensate, reaches a size small enough to reduce the >> uncertainty in the condensate’s momentum, the condensate will reform with a >> lowered number of member atoms. >> >> >> Cheers: Axil >> >> >> > >
