Again, I call upon you who _do_ "know" what the reaction is to put forth the experiment that will demonstrate it is what they say it is and thereby discount the others who "know" what the reaction is. You know -- multiple competing hypotheses -- strong inference and all that.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:01 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > It is if you don't know what the reaction is! > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> A cold fusion nuclear reactor that that puts out as much energy and >> density as a common nuclear reactor cannot possibly be dangerous. >> >> >> 2012/8/31 Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> >> >>> More tea-leaf reading : problems with the domestic certification ? >>> >>> Andrea Rossi >>> August 31st, 2012 at 9:34 >>> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=695&cpage=6#comment-311191> >>> >>> Dear Koen Vandewalle: >>> We have all the resources necessary for a development of our technology, >>> based on our businessplant. I do not think we will have delays as for the >>> industrial apparatuses. For the domestic ones, certification will be >>> possible, I think, after the industrialplants will have produced enough >>> statistics. >>> Warm Regards, >>> A.R. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> [email protected] >> >> >
