Dave, I see them as tools. If you don't like using a wrench, use pliars and many times you can solve the problem.
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, David Roberson wrote: > Well, slap me silly. I would love to throw out QM! I was afraid that I > am the only one around these parts that feels that way. Maybe there are at > least two (three with Mills) of us. > > Actually, it is a little premature to throw out a theory that has worked > so well for so long.... > > Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > To: vortex-l <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 9:54 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields > > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Roberson <[email protected] > <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of time, quantum > > mechanics has some explaining to do. Again, is this evidence for a hole in > > that theory? > > LOL! Yeah, we call it LENR. :-) > > I do not know; but, you put a bunch of these under the influence of a > broken lattice . . . > > As Ruby Carat's stickers say, "The Heat is On". > > I was trying to help DGT improve their process: > http://defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&p=7740#p7740 > > I found their response, er, curious. > > T > > >
