Dear Axil,

A very interesting metaphor- I think the arrogant doctors are the
equivalent of the LENR+ skeptics today. Actually it is a case of
people who*know
*vs the people who *learn* and, unfortunately this
dichotomy is present even inside the CF/LENR
community.
In the Garfield story was there some opposition to
the medical "best practices" that were actually dreadful malpractices? I am
convinced that popular medicine instinctually knows about  the danger of
dirt- germs.

I think that a very nice metaphor was used by John Hadjichristos in the
interview- the Trojan Horse Metaphor: "Odysseus tricked Trojans, disguising
his proton warriors into a neutron gift".

I have studied metaphors, know well the websites
dedicated to them, have taught my students in management of technology
about how to use them e.eg. in innovation, creativity.
John's metaphor- extended is a very good one- it carries all the 4 basic
functions of an useful metaphor: expressive, exegetic, explanatory, and
exploratory.

Thank you for the Garfield story- in our area the story of Ignazius
Semmelweiss is the best known.
Peter


On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Recently, after reading a book about the Garfield assassination, I was
> struck by the parallels to how President James Garfield received atrocious
> medical care after he was shot on July 2, 1881 to the current cold fusion
> dilemma.
>
> It’s all about intellectual arrogance and how destructive that cardinal
> vice can be.
>
> Garfield would have easily survived the bullet, but died weeks later from
> infection after being exposed to gross medical malpractice from the best
> doctors of that time. Most American doctors of that period dismissed the
> "germ theory" pioneered by non-American scientists, such as British doctor
> Joseph Lister.
>
> The arrogance of American physicians of that day and their disrespect of
> the work of foreign scientists resulted in their rejection of modern
> surgical sterile techniques that had been well-established in Europe.
>
> It was an early edition of the intellectual arrogance and the prejudice of
> "American exceptionalism," the belief that America and Americans were
> inherently superior, even divinely exalted.
>
> Because they couldn’t see them, American doctors ridiculed belief in
> bacteria, comparing it to the silly, contemporary belief in fairies.
>
> Doctors even took pride in their filth, carrying blood, pus, and dirt from
> one patient to the next. In 1881 American country doctors were still
> applying hot cow manure to open wounds. The doctors treating Garfield
> routinely performed surgery in their practices without changing their
> clothes or washing their hands and held instruments in their teeth for
> convenience.
>
> Much like the Garfield assassination, arrogance of the critics of Italian
> and Greek developed Cold Fusion have closed their minds to its possibility.
>
> Our current response to the "fever" and "infection" spreading through the
> American scientific community is to allow the most ignorant and
> disingenuous of us to bully the rest of us to inaction and disbelief. The
> level of scientific sophistication of this reactionary group are applying
> to the task is on a par with Garfield’s doctors in 1881. You can’t see
> chemically induced nuclear reactions; therefore it must not be happening.
> But transmutation of elements is natural and is happening all the time in
> the world around us, in the same way that bacteria are all pervasive.
> Therefore, linking nuclear chemical reactions to cold fusion must be a
> hoax.
>
> The embrace of American exceptionalism in its entrenched scientific
> community, including academic, corporate, and governmental groups have only
> grown since Garfield’s time, permeating our general discourse, common
> opinion, culture and politics. American scientific entitlement and
> perceived superiority is the red flag being waved and the idea that
> American science is not bound by either the laws of nature or conciliation
> with work done in other nations is in full bloom in the American energy
> development plan.
>
> Dancing to the tune of its energy-billionaire corporate backers, the
> American science establishment panders to our basest and most selfish
> instincts, luring us to utterly surrender our energy future to fossil
> fuels.
>
> As with the arrogant and ignorant doctors in 1881, established science is
> committing malpractice in the extreme, as primitive, as scientifically
> offensive, and ultimately as lethal as putting hot cow manure on our open
> wounds




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to