Good question, Mark. I am encouraged by the fact that in the basic physics going back years - the Russian Labs did not arrive at the exact same number for hydrogen mass as here.
That could mean different instrumentation introduces systemic errors - or
that there is a natural variation ... and that would indicate that there is
probably an underlying mechanism which tends to equalize it ... or not.
That part is above my pay grade ...
Jones
_____________________________________________
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
Jones wrote:
"When depleted the average mass of hydrogen will have been
reduced to may ~937 MeV."
Will the proton gain back that lost mass? Apparently from
the ZPF/vacuum?
-Mark
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Veeder
> P+P->2He->P+P
If this reaction is always exothermic, wouldn't this mean
the average
the mass of the proton is decreasing with time?
Harry,
Yes, exactly - but even a tiny fraction of ~1GeV per atom
can provide tens of thousands of times more energy than chemical and yet
without transmutation.
The underlying hypothesis for ultimate gain is
mass-to-energy conversion, but with little or no fission, beta decay,
non-reversible fusion, or transmutation. The proton mass is not quantized
and is in the vicinity of 938.272013 MeV on average. In QNF, this value
becomes what is really an "average mass," with expected variations higher
and lower. Imagine a bell curve of mass around the average of 938.27 MeV
with one or two MeV either way.
The "overage" fraction is in play for conversion into energy
- via QCD and Goldstone bosons which convert to magnons. It could amount to
a third of all the atoms. When depleted the average mass of hydrogen will
have been reduced to may ~937 MeV. That is what makes the theory
falsifiable.
This becomes the mystery energy source for Ni-H reactions,
whether they be from Mills, Rossi, DGT, Piantelli, Celani, or Thermacore and
more to come. BTW - this particular solar proton reaction produces it tiny
excess by quantum spin - and it takes approx 10^16 reversible reactions to
provide every eV, but fortunately, they can happen sequentially at approx
10^20 times per second.
Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
