I believe, like many, that the transmutations seen are surface side-effects
of the LENR; and as Rossi now says, are not substantial contributors to the
excess heat effect.  I don't believe that the Cu that Kullander measured
was contamination.  My understanding was that the early e-cat reaction
chambers were stainless and there is no reasonable way to produce that much
Cu contamination within the stainless cell (Kullander said there was no Cu
or Fe in the starting Ni powder).  The fact that Rossi was previously
adamant that the Cu was a transmutation product, probably means that he
didn't add it as an ingredient.  A case could be made that the Fe was
contamination, but personally I believe the Fe was an additive since Rossi
conveniently left out any comment on the greater percentage [than Cu] of Fe
that Kullander found in the ash.  This leaves the Cu as a thin surface
transmutation by-product of the LENR.  10% surface transmutation does not
sound like too much for a Ni ash of 6 supposed months of high rate LENR.

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

> In this presentation, Rossi stated that Ni transmutation is not
> responsible for extra heat. This is a secondary negligible phenomena and
> nearly most of what is detected is due contamination.
>
> 2012/9/9 Bob Higgins <[email protected]>
>
>> The Kullander report of the 6 month used ash stated that it "contains"
>> 10% Cu and 11% Fe.  It is not clear by what analysis that assessment was
>> made, but it was likely EDAX (Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectral analysis),
>> normally made via SEM.  Such analysis is a surface measurement.  In the
>> case of dense materials like Ni and Cu, the penetration depth for most of
>> the X-ray spectra is only about 100 nanometers.  So Kullander was probably
>> reporting on the surface concentration.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Teslaalset 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> So what about the ash that he allowed a Swedish university to check that
>>> contained 30% Copper?
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> [email protected]
>
>


-- 

Regards,
Bob Higgins

Reply via email to