I would say most of last years steam-based demos. Claiming COPs that were far higher than what was realistic, but specifically http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8SeOteFPtM 3:00-4:00 doesn't exactly inspire confidence, looks to be tweaking the power to increase steam output when Lewan is out of the room and he is not being watched (far more steam as Lewan replaces the tube than when he first pulled it out).
I no longer think it was ignorance on Rossi's part that lead to such consistently bad calorimetry and ambiguous results, he was trying to create uncertainty and wiggle room for himself to be able to exaggerate his results. It is notable that the few independent groups of testers that really had proper access to check results (NASA linked group, Defkalion now Swedes) have all had tests that were either didn't work or under-delivered on promises, would love to hear from insiders who were there. And we know that Rossi has lied on many other occasions too (eg shipment of 1MW unit). Totally massively untrustworthy. On 10 September 2012 15:58, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > To what faked results are you referring exactly? > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Lynn < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> What I would run screaming from is someone who faked results with a >> straight face (as we saw in one of the demos last year)... >> >
